Congress Criticizes Centre’s Decision to Allow Government Employees in RSS Activities
New Delhi: The Congress launched a scathing attack on the Centre for its decision to lift the ban on government employees participating in RSS activities, accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of attempting to politicize public servants on ideological grounds. The move has drawn widespread criticism from opposition leaders, who argue that it undermines the neutrality of public servants and challenges constitutional supremacy.
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge highlighted historical tensions between the RSS and national figures like Sardar Patel, pointing out that the ban on RSS activities for government employees was lifted after 58 years. He alleged that the BJP aims to exert control over constitutional bodies through such measures, criticizing what he perceives as a covert attempt to alter the Constitution.
The controversy erupted after an office memorandum dated July 9, issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, surfaced, removing references to the RSS from previous directives dating back to 1966. This decision has sparked widespread condemnation, with opposition leaders like Jairam Ramesh and Mayawati accusing the government of pandering to the RSS for political gain.
Mayawati, leader of the Bahujan Samaj Party, described the move as a politically motivated attempt to appease the RSS and demanded its immediate reversal. She emphasized the importance of government employees maintaining impartiality and serving public interest within the framework of the Constitution.
The development has ignited a heated debate over the role of ideological affiliations in public service, with critics arguing that it could compromise the neutrality and integrity of government institutions. The opposition vows to continue its efforts to safeguard constitutional principles and democratic values amidst growing concerns over the government’s agenda.
The Centre, on the other hand, defended its decision as the withdrawal of an outdated and unconstitutional directive, emphasizing the rights of individuals to associate freely. However, the move remains contentious, reflecting broader tensions over the intersection of politics and bureaucracy in India.
